Showing posts with label Valassis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Valassis. Show all posts

Friday, April 16, 2010

Leaving the Mailstram: Saturation Advertising

This blog had previously reported on the actions of Valassis to use alternative delivery for its saturation advertising products.  Last month, PowerDirect, a California company that manages a nationwide network providing door delivery of advertising introduced a new direct-to-door, co-op polybag media program announced that it will launch its service in Las Vegas on July 3. 

PowerDirect like other firms trying to compete with the Postal Service for a share of the market for delivery of print advertising to households is a firm focused on local delivery of advertising.   Their business model allows them to compete with the Postal Service on both a price and service basis.  The success of these firms suggests there is a business model that allows for home delivery of advertising at below $1 per stop and more than likely at a cost that makes their advertising products competitive with Postal Service delivery.   This business model is not the model of FedEx, UPS that shifts parcels going to remote locations and those that generate less than $3 to $4 in revenue to the Postal Service through their services integrating pick-up and transportation to near destination by UPS or FedEx and delivery by the Postal Service.  

In its Press release, Mike Hiskett, VP of Sales at PowerDirect highlighted the Postal Services problems to press the case for the new product. “We have seen the many challenges that our retailer clients face in trying to reach consumers at home on the weekend when they are most likely to make purchase decisions and shop,” states Mike Hiskett, VP of Sales at PowerDirect. With shrinking newspaper circulation, limited Total Market Coverage (TMC) programs, and the prospect of a Saturday postal-service cutback, many of our clients are seeking a more reliable weekend marketing medium to drive incremental sales."

The Postal Service can expect more and more firms in the advertising and periodical delivery business to begin nibbling away at what it perceives to be an impenetrable market.  These firms know now that they can compete on price.  Their challenge going forward is to convince customers that they can compete on service and investment return.

Sunday, February 21, 2010

Is it Time to Choose Alternative Delivery?

Mailers face greater uncertainty today than ever before about the future of the Postal Service.  Mailers face the real possibility that rates could begin rising faster than inflation in 2011 and beyond if the Postal Service's volume projections do not pan out or Congress fails to make all of the changes necessary to ensure a viable postal enterprise.  The face the likelihood of less service as the Postal Service switches to 5-day service and less certain service as the inevitable glitches arise during the transition.

So what should a mailer do?

Most mailers have few options.   If they want to delivery to households, access to the mailbox is key and only the Postal Service has access.  Therefore, if they want a delivery to a household, they have to have a product that does not require delivery to the mailbox.  Valassis currently is expanding its use of alternative delivery networks in numerous media markets across the United States for delivery of its saturation advertising products.   In these markets, Valassis partners deliver the ads in plastic bags on door steps instead of the mail box.   This delivery mechanism that works well for saturation advertising and work even better if others saturation mailers, including Valpak, political candidates, community colleges, and health care facilities would partner with Valassis and use the same network.  Right now Valassis and other have the choice of alternative delivery firms for saturation advertising in at least 28 states, with local firms serving customers in most others.

Periodical mailers tried to develop an alternative delivery network for household delivery of periodicals nearly 20 years ago with Publisher's Express.   This experiment ended once the Postal Service lowered its rates and increased mailer worksharing which eliminated the cost advantage that Publisher's Express promised. 

Mailers seeking delivery to business addresses may have options but few have explored them fully.  Most business addresses do not have mailboxes, so alternative delivery services have greater access to the recipient than they do for home delivery.

A vibrant periodical delivery industry has existed for over 35 years focused on deliveries to business addresses.   This industry offers delivery of daily, weekly, and monthly periodicals to businesses in most metropolitan areas.  These firms currently generate less than 25% of revenue generated by the Postal Service and the private sector in the delivery of periodicals to business addresses in the markets they serve.   As these firms regularly stop at most businesses in their service area on a daily or weekly basis, they could add volume from mailers to businesses that use the Postal Service at very competitive prices

Right now mailers to businesses facing the greatest price pressure are those that mail periodicals.  Advertising in trade and business publications down so finding a cheaper delivery route could sustain the print product until the economy and advertising recovers, or the publication fully switches to a digital only format.    The problem is even greater for mailers whose format will not pass the Postal Service's "droop test."  Alternative periodical delivery firms would have little trouble handling this mail now at rates more than competitive with the Postal charges now or will charge after the new "droop test" rules go into effect.  


Right now, I would advise mailers that are concerned about the uncertainty associated with the Postal Service's rates, service quality, or acceptance rules should begin exploring what alternatives now exist.   I would expect that most would find the breadth of offerings now available would surprise them.   If you need assistance in exploring available options, and if necessary creating new ones using the existing alternative delivery infrastructure contact me at alan.robinson@directcomgroup.com .

Thursday, September 24, 2009

The End of the Monopoly

The postal monopoly has ceased to exist. This is a bold statement given that no law has changed. However, the economic downturn has forced every sender of mail looks at their alternatives and many have found competitive alternatives from electronic and physical delivery options that are faster and more cost effective than the mail.

The shift in demand means that mail is now primarily a means to distribute advertising. Nearly all advertising has alternative modes of delivery and mail is used only if it provides a higher financial return than other advertising modes. But now two postal competitors, newspapers and United Parcel Service have found ways to chip away at the delivery monopoly that illustrates how little power the legal monopoly actually has.

The delivery of saturation advertising has always faced competition from local newspapers. While newspapers may find that their circulation, display and classified advertising advertising is declining, they have one bright spot in free standing inserts. Spending for free standing inserts grew by 4.6% in the first half of this year. At the same time spending on postage for delivery of saturation mail advertising (Enhanced Carrier Route) declined by 10%. Valassis and its competitors will prepare an advertiser's copy for delivery by mail or free standing insert depending on which mode the advertiser finds most cost effective. The shift in market share from mail to free standing inserts suggests that the Postal Service is losing market share and iits delivery prices are not competitive to newspaper delivery of the same copy. Further losses in this market may come as newspapers expand their delivery of "mini-papers" composed of 4 pages of newsprint surrounding coupons and other free standing inserts, most likely at prices below what it would cost Valassis to pay the Postal Service to deliver.

The competition from newspaper focuses on part of the hard-copy advertising market that has always fallen outside of the monopoly. The newspapers will try to skirt the monopoly slightly by targeting the "mini-paper" to homes that do not receive a newspaper. In this way they deliver two different items to specific addresses without having to put an address on any piece. Subscribers get the newspaper. Non-subscribers get the mini-paper.

Another assault on the monopoly on addressed advertising is coming from United Parcel Service which has just found another way around that restriction. Yesterday, United Parcel Service announced Direct to Door, a new product that delivers small boxes of advertising, at a price below the cost of direct mail. UPS offers the low price because it only delivers to addresses where it also delivers a parcel.

UPS's new product is attracting some of the Postal Service's best customers and more importantly customers that mail to some of the highest income and highest mail volume zip codes in the country. UPS's initial customers include Men's Warehouse, Finish Line, Williams Sonoma' s Pottery Barn and West Elm divisions, Sephora, and Zappos, an on-line shoe company owned by Amazon. As these customers use the higher prices regular standard mail products to reach their potential customers, UPS is competing against regular standard mail rates and not the lower enhanced carrier route rates.

UPS and advertisers are targeting recipients that buy over the Internet and more importantly likely buy higher priced products over the Internet. In this way, UPS goes after the key advantage that the Postal Service had over all other advertising media, the ability to target specific customers. UPS's effort along with targeted e-mail, Internet search and display advertising erode the value of the addressed advertising monopoly to the point where the value may be quite minimal.

So what services are left within an effective monopoly?

Most transaction mail no long is without competition. Few new bank, insurance, credit card, gym club, cell phone, or brokerage accounts have mail as the default option for paying or receiving bills and statements. Only health care bills, statements, and payments remain as nearly exclusive users of the mail and electronic records could eventually allow the health care industry to follow financial services and telecommunications into a paperless environment.

Mail delivered periodicals compete every day with in-store and Internet delivery of content. A subscriber has to actively want the hard copy now to receive the periodical. Many business and industry publications have illuminated hard-copy editions completely. For a periodical to continue using the mail, the mail must compete with alternative modes and increasingly have a customer willing to pay more to receive hard copy.

Non-profit mailers showed these past two years that even if their low-priced mail may not be price sensitive, it is highly sensitive to the economy. With tight budgets driven by lower levels of contributions, non-profits are looking at mail as a cost center and newsletters, solicitations, and other documents that used to be sent by mail are now sent electronically. For these organizations, mail at even non-profit rates do not provide sufficient value to justify the production and postage expense especially when e-mail, search engine advertising, social media can deliver the same newsletter or generate the same net-revenue. The mail that they still send must compete with the value that alternative media provide.

This leaves two parts of the mail stream where the Postal Service provides service with minimal concerns about competition: 1) correspondence, and in particular announcements, greeting cards, invitations, and holiday cards; and 2) transactions for those not connected to the web. This is a very small part of the Postal Service's $60 billion in revenue. Having a monopoly to protect these customers seems hardly worthwhile.