Friday, April 30, 2010

Smart Post - What Does its Success Suggest for Letter and Flat Mailers

In my previous post, I noted that FedEx volumes for Smart Post exceeded the Postal Service's measured volumes for Parcel Select.   This implied that FedEx Ground, UPS and other parcel consolidators used other postal products, most likely Standard Mail Parcels, to handle the parcels that they want delivered less than 1 pound.  The attention that Smart Post received from analysts raised some additional questions that suggest that there may be Postal Service revival strategies that are not the focus of the current discussions about future business models for the Postal Service.

So lets start with what we know about Smart Post and how the Postal Service handles it.

What We Know
  1. The volume of parcels that FedEx Ground and United Parcel Service employ the Postal Service to delivery are growing faster than the United States parcel market is growing.
  2. The volume of parcels that the Postal Service is handling for all customers is not growing as fast as the overall market.  
  3. The Postal Service's volumes for its products that that FedEx Ground and UPS use is declining while their volume using these products are increasing.  This trend means that the Postal Service is becoming increasingly reliant on FedEx Ground and United Parcel Service to market its delivery services to shippers.
  4. The growth in the use of the Postal Service by FedEx Ground is attributed to the improvements in delivery service quality that came when the National Distribution Center network restructuring was implemented.
  5. The growth in the use of the Postal Service also came at a time that the Postal Service held rates for parcels under 1 pound constant (due to the rate cap) making the Postal Service's delivery service more competitive with FedEx Ground or United Parcel Service using their own resources to deliver light weight parcels.  It is unlikely that costs that FedEx Ground or UPS would have incurred using their own resources remained constant during this period. 
  6. The network distribution center realignment has reduced the cost of handling bulk parcels.  See USPS-OIG (Management Advisory Report – Network Distribution Center Phase 1Activation (Report Number EN-MA-10-001)
  7. The cost savings from the network distribution realignment would have been larger if management had taken actions to reduce excess employees months earlier than they had.  (See (Management Advisory Report – Network Distribution Center Phase 1Activation (Report Number EN-MA-10-001. p 12) 
What Are The Implications?
  • A serious network realignment effort both cuts costs and improves service.
  • Improvements in service and competitive prices increase use of the Postal Service's delivery service.
  • The Postal Service could improve its competitive position in the delivery of printed advertising if it implemented a network realignment for its letter and flat mail streams that at least as aggressive as it just did for parcels.
  • It may be time to rethink the current classification of some parcel services as market dominant products as most users of these products are buying delivery services from the Postal Service in a highly competitive market for the provision of services to deliver small parcels.
What is holding back the Postal Service?
  1. Cost savings from network realignments require that plans to excess employees need to begin before it is known how many employees may be released.  The USPS-OIG report indicates that it takes between 4 and 11 months to complete the Article 12 provisions in its labor contracts.   So unless it begins the excessing process before a consolidation is approved, it will have excess employees in standby rooms for months waiting for the negotiated process to be completed. 
  2. Currently network realignment including excessing unneeded employees takes as long as 18 months from the time a proposal is announced until all excess employees are reassigned.
  3. Current facilities may not be the right size or in the right location to optimally restructure the network.  For example, consolidating carrier route sequencing in processing plants would reduce operating costs and increase the proportion of mail that the Postal Service handles that is route sequenced, as this consolidation reduces mailer transportation costs to the location where the sequencing occurs.
  4. Capital does not exist to cover the costs of relocating or expanding facilities to meet the needs of a more streamlined network.   
  5. Capital does not exist to cover the severance or early retirement incentive costs required to handle excess employees.
  6. Political considerations make it difficult to consolidate facilities and just as importantly increase the time required to complete public hearings prior to announcing that a consolidation proposal will proceed.   The effort required to prepare and hold public hearings add to the cost burden. 
Network realignment should have been the Postal Service's first priority in its effort to cut costs as it is the one cost cutting move that actually improves the quality of service the Postal Service offers by streamlining the delivery process.  The combination of numerous actions of Congress that drained the Postal Service of needed cash, declining revenue due to electronic diversion and the recession, a nearly 18 month time frame from the time a proposal is proposed to the time all excess employees leave the payroll, the political minefield of reducing postal employment at any time and in particular during a recession put it on the back burner.

Instead the Postal Service is moving forward with actions that affect its core customers (mail that contains advertising, including advertising in magazines and accompanying bills and statements) the most: eliminating service on Saturdays and raising prices.   The impact of this strategy is clear.
  • Valassis is expanding its use of alternative delivery networks in nearly every market where such services exist.
  • Firms that provide alternative delivery in portions of markets are expanding the geographic reach to cover more households.  For example, Donnelley Distribution has just added Delaware County Pennsylvania to its coverage area and Power Direct is expanding into the Las Vegas market.  Both of these companies provide services that effectively compete on a price and service basis with the rates the Postal Service charges for saturation flats.
  • The Economist is experimenting with home delivery using delivery services that provide newspaper or periodical delivery for other customers.  If the Economist's subscribers like the new method of delivery, it is likely that the Economist will continue to use alternative delivery. 
  • Major media companies, in addition to expanding their use of alternative delivery for periodicals and saturation advertising, are discussing nationwide distribution deals with hand delivery companies to move items currently handled as First Class mail to alternative delivery using a combination of drop-shipping and same day delivery, a service that the Postal Service does not offer, to avoid violating the private express statutes.

3 comments:

uncommonsense said...

Fed Ex smart post is specifically designed to avoid the National Distribution Center network and instead use Fed-Ex’s own distribution network to inject the parcels into the USPS network way downstream of any NDC. It has absolutely nothing to do with and never comes near any National Distribution Center.

“For example, consolidating carrier route sequencing in processing plants would reduce operating costs and increase the proportion of mail that the Postal Service handles that is route sequenced, as this consolidation reduces mailer transportation costs to the location where the sequencing occurs.”
Nearly all carrier route sequencing is already done in processing plants except in very rural areas. Consolidating to fewer plants would reduce the transportation costs of mailers in order to achieve the same discounts while increasing the transportation costs of the USPS. It would also make the entry points for mail further from the delivery unit. This makes same day processing for items like newspapers or other periodicals much more difficult for the USPS to accomplish efficiently. This would further drive away periodical volume from the USPS. This is one of the problems with the new FSS system.

Anonymous said...

The Postal Service's volumes for its products that that FedEx Ground and UPS use is declining while their volume using these products are increasing. This trend means that the Postal Service is becoming increasingly reliant on FedEx Ground and United Parcel Service to market its delivery services to shippers.

I don't quite understand that comment. FedEx and UPS drop their mail into the Postal Service at the rural end of processing. Wouldn't it be more appropriate to say that Fed Ex and UPS are becoming more dependent on the USPS to absorb the least profitable aspects of their shipping?
FedEx and UPS don't use the USPS NDC network, they use their own network and drop into the USPS mailstream closer to the DDU level - thus eliminating the last and most costly mile consuming leg of delivery.

Anonymous said...

SmartPost seems to be a combination of the least efficient methods of both Fedex and the USPS. Example - I ordered products from Chefs Catalog to be shipped to Nome Alaska. Seeing that Fedex was the shipper (Fedex SmartPost) gave me warm fuzzies because Anchorage has one of the largest Fedex distribution hubs in the world. Instead the product started Jan 12th in Denver, showed in Kent,WA on Jan 18th where there was no tracking info until today (2/3/2012) with a transit stamp showing Fairbanks Alaska. Fairbanks? There are 3-5 flights per day from Anchorage to Nome and 0 from Fairbanks. I suspect the not-so-SmartPost will now ship the product to Anchorage and, with any luck, it will make it to Nome with just about one month transit time from Denver. In my opinion, I see nothing "smart" about SmartPost. The packages have consumed unnecessary travel time being routed through Fairbanks and Alaska continues to be subjected to dismal delivery service even though we have an international passenger and freight airport in Anchorage with enough flights/day to handle incoming mail.