| Postal Service – APWU & NMHU Agreements | Canada Post – CUPW Agreement |
Guaranteed Jobs | Regular full and part time employees guaranteed job after 6 years | Regular full and part time employees guaranteed job after 5 years |
Transfers | Involuntary transfers allowed within 100 miles of origin facility; longer transfers possible with compensation | Involuntary transfers allowed within 25 miles of origin facility |
Full Time / Part Time / Casual/Transitional Employees ratio | APWU: Part time employees limited to 2.5% of employees within a district; casual employees limited to 6% of employees with a district; different limits apply to drivers | Full time regular employee workhours must exceed 80% of total workhours after accounting for absences. |
| Canada Post | USPS |
Straight Time Regular | 76.9% | 80.2% |
Part-time Regular | 16.5% | 12.4% |
Casual/Transitional/Temporary Regular | 6.7% | 7.4% |
Total Regular Hours | 100.0% | 100.0% |
The overall difference gives Canada Post slightly more flexibility in staffing its processing plants than the Postal Service. With a higher proportion of part-time employees, Canada Post may be able to deal with the changing nature of work with the decline of single-piece mail.
The difference in the mix of employees is most important in trying to cut staff without layoffs. Canada Post's full time employees tend to be both older and have many years with the corporation. Part-time workers are younger and have a significantly higher normal turnover rate than full time employees. Temporary employees have no employment guarantees.
Canada Post's could reduce its workhours by reducing temporary employees and allowing the turnover in part-time employees to provide work for full-time employees until normal attrition patterns within the Winnipeg plant and postal locations within 25 miles open up enough positions to bring the full time complement down 15%. Clearly this will take a couple of years but it is doable if the full time attrition rate is 4-5%. Canada Post's plans really depend on employees finding better opportunities elsewhere.
The employment guarantee and part-time maximum provisions of labor contracts of Canada Post and the United States Postal Service were both signed before the decline in single-piece mail changed the nature of managing workhours in mail processing plants. In all likelihood, reworking these long-standing provisions will come up in future labor negotiations as Canada Post and the United States Postal Service adjust its labor contracts to new market realities. It will be interesting to see how the differences in the negotiating processes in Canada and the United States result in changes in these provisions.
3 comments:
How much older is the Canadian postal work force? I do believe the average age of the USPS employee is 49 and more than half could retire within five years. Which is the older force and does that comment matter to either arguement?
To follow up on Anonymous (6:36), according to reports by the Office of Personell Management, almost 50%of all US postal workers will be eligible to retire by 2012.
Also - The APWU and USPS agreed to eliminate part-time flexible schedule clerks in all plants with more than 100 employees. Those plants are now 100% full-time fixed schedule employees.
The USPS claimed to need employee flexibility, yet history showed that even part time flexible employees were always scheduled to work the same hours each week. The USPS "needed" flebility, but did not schedule in a flexible manner. Hence the agreement.
Many, many part-time flexible employee has been converted to full-time after management scheduled him/her the exact same schedule for six months straight. This is required by agreement. They WANT flexibility, just don't seem to know how to use it.
Post a Comment